Saturday, February 20, 2010

20th February, birthday of Yugoslavia

“....But it is especially around the conflict between Catholics and Orthodoxies, born from the Eastern Schism (1054), that is revolving the endless spiral of violence of the Balkans, of which the recent war of Kosovo can be considered the bitter ending. The "thorn in one's side" for the Catholics has been always the Serbian ethnic group, of Orthodox religion, who for more time tried to prevail in the region, putting at risk the existence of the Croats and hence of the Catholic religion.

Not for a case the Vatican has always considered Croatia, since the era of the Austro-Hungarian empire, "the last bulwark" of Catholicism against the advancing of the Orthodox religion......


In its turn the Central Empires (Austria-Germany) always cultivated aims of conquest towards the Serbia, which was putting a serious obstacle against the pan-germanic plan of expansion towards Eastern and towards the Arab countries, represented by the famous railroad project Berlin-Baghdad.

It was just existing a natural convergence of interests on the Serbian-Croat territory, between Vatican and Austria-Germany, since the age of the Hapsburg.....”

(Quotes from Luogocomune of Massimo Mazzucco ($))

If there’s a concept well rooted in the both profane and academic culture, this is the ascertainment of the anti-German and anti-Austrian nature of the same idea at the basis of a “common state for the Slavs of the South”, alias of the Yugoslavia. The concept of an independent state embracing Slav population, some of them for centuries under a German domination, and creating a wall of ethnic mangrove impenetrable for the modern descendants of that old famous and never-built Berlin-Baghdad rail road line, became soon a material image producing a cascade of low ideological sub-products in the minds excited by ideology.
The political and ideological discussion were so foreseeable that the implications descended from the presumptions with more punctuality than the physiological effects following a glass of coke after having eaten a yoghurt. The boredom was not waiting too much time before to assault me. There were only the episodes of real-life to lavish interest to those ideological diatribes.
Evidently it existed a greater ideological context embracing the unaware minds of the participants in such discussions, an invisible ideological context that was quite controlling, like a mechanical logical machine, also opposed political creeds. Perhaps today it is possible to trace the origin of such a logical machine in the eighteen century's rooms of the Vatican.

The Propaganda Fide had to elaborate some ideological tricks in order to disguise and hide the true finality of the creation of a “common homeland of the Balkans Slavs”, for which the Vatican and the Jesuits were seriously engaged at least since the middle of the XIX century (*). Those ideological tricks, still today, when Rome is just putting his claws on that fabulous plunder consisting in the Schismatic Christian world, are infesting with an astounding tenaciousness every corner of the cultural, ideological, intellectual, or religious field where the theme “history of the Balkans” is dealt.

The designs Rome had in mind for the Protestantism and for the Schismatics have been keenly exchanged through those common daily ideological glasses purposely built with a religious cross-eyed optics. Rome wants the radical destruction of Protestantism because Protestantism is defined as denial – not as difference - of the same theological legitimacy of the church of Rome. But as regard the Schismatic Christendom, Rome wants to hardly hit the Orthodox churches, to heavily punish the Schismatics in order to weaken their religious strengthen, but not to entirely annihilate them. Rome wants to devour and to metabolize them in Roman Catholic fat, whose weight will help the Vatican to definitively squeeze not only the most hated adversary, the descendants of Martin Luther theology, but also any other competitor on the scene. The simple trick of the Propaganda Fide , consists in to expose the actual and future annihilating project intended for the Protestant enemy under the cultural costume of an unrepeatable event of the past, aimed against the Schismatic target.

Those glasses, like the old Ray-bans, are very common all along the usual ideological horizon. You can purchase a pair of them almost in every cultural or ideological tourist village which welcomes the bored westerner who is searching excitement with cheap conspiracy information. A part the official information where they are almost an oblige, you can find them from common 'alternative' sources of information like the one of Massimo Mazzucco who exposes the “Zionist Neocon” as “true masterminds” of 911, to other few but famous sources of information which, at the opposite, are exposing the 911 as “product of the Jesuit NWO”. Such a diffusion witnesses the excellence of those glasses, whose better value is consisting in to render cross-eyed a person meanwhile at the same time he is convinced to have acquired the sight of a Condor.....

If the same usual official academic information is telling to you that with the pontificate of Leo XIII's successor the papacy should “boldly embark upon the troubled waters of European diplomacy, seeking alliances and taking desperate risks upon the fortune in the next war” (**), well, the possibility of misunderstanding, even opportunistic misunderstanding, are decisively very low. All along the second half of the XIX century you have a continue boiling where the true poor lobster which was cooked alive in the Eurasian pot, surely was not that “Vatican diplomacy”, but just that Drei Kaiser Agreement. Under that pot the bold initiative of the Jesuit order and of its religious disguise, the Vatican, were keeping high the flames, feeding them with the thirsty of revenge of some European subjects against those Central empires.

The same events leading in 1878 to the Russian consent for the Austrian occupation of Bosnia Herzegovina, witness the easiness with which a fourth actor could have successful worked to put enmity between those Drei Kaisers. The first fruits of that “bold embarking” of the Leo XIII's successor (but truly of Leo XIII the same!) foreign diplomacy, could be represented by its reflex, that slowly increasing competition and even enmity between Schismatic Russia and the Imperial-Protestant dynasties of Central Europe/Amber Path. The approach of the Jesuit-Masonic French empire to Moscow was surely not a present of God to the Vatican, but just a fruit of that obsessive ambitious and shameless new Vatican diplomacy.

When the possibility of coming back for that horrible Triple Nightmare Agreement went definitively averted with the ceasefire of 1918, it was the global Eurasian new ideological and political context to assure the necessary freezing of the very unstable and mobile religious battlefield exited from WWI. Before: Bolshevism, Fascism and National Socialism; then: the ideological clash of the Cold War Hoax. They simply were the secular, not religious forms of dynamic ecumenism, which were assembling together and/or separating millions if not billions of individuals, to build the giant chess of a world ideological game. Following the desire of Rome, the game was keeping paralysed the principal forces of the society. Like a Glacial Age, which paralysed the world hibernating the religious question (making it appear as definitively dead). That age is known under the Propaganda Fide label of “Century of the Ideologies” (***).

Hence the Yugoslavia was not built to stop the “German-Austrian-Vatican imperialism”. At the opposite, the “German-Austrian imperialism” and “expansionism” on the Balkans were not only the answers to a diplomacy of encircling and isolation putted at work by Rome, but also the obliged reflex of defence against the open and without scruples new Vatican policy of subversion of the old European religious and temporal order. Putting the claws on the religious coffer of the Balkans, the Robber of the 7 Hills started to purposely disseminate the wind of the enmity among those Three Emperors, an irreplaceable step to transform then the Amber Path and the Balkans in that “Cemetery for the religious enemies of Rome” as it is well renowned today.
Every day the Vatican widow spiritually enters in that cemetery to visit the grave of the Hapsburg and to give a look to the ones of the Hohenzollern and Romanov. Of course not to cry 'em, but to be sure that they shall never come back.

Here an excerpt from the book “Il papato e l'impero” (“the papacy and the empire” (§)), the author of the chapter from where it has been taken is Rita Tolomeo; the text at the beginning refers to the scenario in Eurasia after the Berlin congress in 1878 avoided war between Russia and Austria:

Also the political picture appeared deeply changed: Russia, the winner on the field and creator of a great Bulgaria with the Saint Stephan peace, came out as loser on the diplomatic level, but notwithstanding that she was not disposed to renounce to her role of defender of the Orthodox Christians; the Catholic France was still feeling the defeat suffered at Sedan and in consequence she was remaining absent from an area which for centuries respected her under the dresses of protector of the Catholics; the Germany of Bismarck was seeing the recognition of her role of great economical and political power which was having in the South East of Europe its natural market for the proper flourishing economy. Also on the desk of saint Peter was sitting since 20 February 1878 a new pontiff, Leo XIII, in the world Gioacchino Pecci, whose arrival would have signed the beginning of a new phase in the relations with the Christendom of the East, marked by a search of direct relations and by a greater reciprocal consideration; on the political level his pontificate would have known a new opening towards the Ottoman Turkey which, in the east was embracing Catholic communities of different rites, and would have favored the coming back on the eastern religious scene of the France and her approach to the Russia.

The improving of the religious conditions of such communities, the establishing of Catholic hierarchies also in the states of recent independence, the conversion of the “dissidents”, the re-unification of the separated brothers, were, since the beginning of his long pontificate, some of the chief cares of Leo XIII. To the relation with the Christian East he dedicated a great number of encyclical, apostolic letters, addresses and speeches affirming many times to work in the hope to join it to himself “with the lasting tie of the concord”. The encyclical Grande munus christiani nominis propagandi by him issued on the 30th September 1880, which was celebrating the mission carried out by the two saint apostles of the Slavs, Cyril and Methodius and was proclaiming them saints of the Universal church, aroused great expectations by the united Christians who wanted to demonstrate their enthusiastic assent with a pilgrimage to Rome. The manifestation, which took place in July 1881 and saw the participation of one thousand and four hundreds Slavs of the double monarchy, was directed by the bishop Josip Juraj Strossmayer, one of the most tough promoters of the re-approaching between the churches in the XIX century, as decisive moment for the obtaining of the political union of the southern Slavs.

XIII, Leo:

Celebrating the end of the schism with Iranian SA300

Charitable Pirañas over the Balkans

The “Drei Freddy Krueger” populating the sleeps of Leo XIII


Leo XIII - XIII Dec 1942 - XIII Dec 2009:


($) Excerpts translated from the page:
“.....Ma è soprattutto attorno al conflitto fra cattolici e ortodossi, nato dallo Scisma d'Oriente (1054), che ruota l'interminabile spirale di violenza dei Balcani, di cui la recente guerra del Kosovo (1991) si può considerare l'amaro epilogo. La "spina nel fianco" per i cattolici è sempre stata l'etnia serba, di religione ortodossa, che ha più volte cercato di prendere il sopravvento nella regione, mettendo a rischio la sussistenza dei croati, e quindi della religione cattolica.
Non a caso il Vaticano ha sempre considerato la Croazia, fin dai tempi dell'Impero Austro-Ungarico, "l'ultimo baluardo" cattolico contro l'avanzata della religione ortodossa.
A sua volta gli Imperi Centrali (Austria-Germania) hanno sempre coltivato mire di conquista verso la Serbia, che poneva un serio ostacolo al piano pan-germanico di espansione verso oriente ed i paesi arabi, rappresentato dal famoso progetto ferroviario Berlino-Baghdad.
Esisteva quindi già una naturale convergenza di interessi sul territorio serbo-croato, fra Vaticano e Austria-Germania, sin dal tempo degli Asburgo.....”.
I omitted other excerpts in the middle, for example the quote of mons. Stepinac, even more interesting, who told – revealing those glasses – that the “Schism is nearly worst than the Protestantism”.... Or: exchanging the roles to confuse the minds.

(*) Sunday, May 17, 2009 "Anton the Jesuit"
"Slovenian Jesuit priest Anton Korošec, prime minister of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenians in 1928-1929
One of the most important key figures in the Vatican and Jesuits’ Balkan and North Adriatic plots was the Slovenian Jesuit priest Anton Korošec. Born in 1872 and died in 1940, the S.J. Anton Korošec soon became a leader of the Slovenian nationalists. He was consecrated Jesuit priest of Rome in 1895 in the city of Graz/Gradec. When the Hapsburg empire was still existing, he was keenly using the request of an independent national state for the Slovenians to melt it inside a larger federal state including all the s.c. “South Slavic” nations, hence Croatia and Serbia. In 1917 he became the president of the Slovenska ljudska stranka (Slovenian Popular party), the once “CDU” or “Christian Democratic” party of Slovenia.............”

(**) See again Douglas Willinger's Continuing Counter Reformation blog - Thursday, October 11, 2007 "The New York Times On the Papacy and Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowski":
“.....If we assume that this spirited and resolute prelate will shortly be ruling the Church through its nominal head, it becomes a most anxious question how he will accept the existing political conditions of Europe which have so radically changed since 1875. The new rulers of the Germans have been at pains to show their desire to abolish the last traces of the Kulterkampf. When the pending Prussian Education bill is passed, the German Catholics will be actually stronger than they were before the May laws. During the last half year these dispatches have frequently reflected the new interest which William and his immediate entourage are displaying in the Polish question. Of course a good deal of this has arisen naturally from the contemplation of the necessity of sooner or later fighting Russia: but even more it represents the effort to allure Ledochowski into friendship with Germany by an appeal to his national sentiment. How far this has succeeded will be, as has been said, a most anxious question.
In any event under this new regime there would be an abrupt cessation of pastorals on Socialistic and labor problems and of poems about St. Thomas Aquinas. We should instead see the Vatican boldly embark upon the troubled waters of European diplomacy, seeking alliances and taking desperate risks upon the fortune in the next war.......”

(***) So it is not a casual coincidence the theological sign of both the Global Warming and of the 2012 end-of-the-world with its Solar cult, especially if we compare them with the probable epilogue of the religious war of Rome against the world. Is the metaphorical allusion to the “increasing heat melting the ice” only the emotive allegorical introduction for the near end of that long historical parenthesis (an opportune tactic disguise) named “Modern World” of which the “Century of the Ideologies” was the ending phase? So was really able the Counter Reformation, after five centuries of asymmetric total war, to take back the world to the Middle Age? To the before-Luther and anti-Luther Vatican Middle Age? If we see the religious sign with which the date 12-21-2012 has been charged:

Tuesday, December 15, 2009 "Wlodimir Ledochowski 12-21-2012 'Day of Redemption'?!":
“.....Other names Włodzimierz Ledóchowski Born 1866 Location Sitzenthal in Loosdorf, near St. Pölten (Lower Austria) Bloodline
Married No Children No Position Superior General (1915-1942)
Source of Facts and Important Announcement
Status Under Article 64.6 of the Covenant of One-Heaven (Pactum De Singularis Caelum) by Special Qualification shall be known as a Saint, with all sins and evil acts they performed forgiven.
Date of formal Beatification Day of Redemption UCA[E1:Y1:A1:S1:M9:D1] also known as Fri, 21 Dec 2012.....”
… is evident that the epochal melting of the ideological ice freezing the religious question we are observing today, has its parallel twin in the “melting of the Poles' ice” by the Global warming. In this case all those abundant production of motion pictures and various media entertainment material on the prehistoric ages with their dinosaurs is not limited to a question of profit of the film industry, but a question to introduce a true religious epochal changing first in the minds and souls of people and then (Ho Chi Minh docet) in the true material battlefield. “Jurassik Park” and “Ice Age” films are even funny (especially the last series “Ice Age”). But you can have more fun trying to de-crypt the allegorical theology of the “coming back of the old monsters” applying what you learned in this message. A further confirmation that the theme of Hollywood's motion pictures is in relation with the triumph of the Counter Reformation war of the Jesuit order, is given by the ascertainment that Hollywood is not in the hands of the Jews (as Rome wants you to think), but of those bishops who are the true masterminds of the Mafia in America:

Remembering Tony Gambino by Greg Szymanski
“...........“My grandfather was Lucky Luciano so I had it made,” said Gambino, now 63 and living on the East Coast with a probation stipulation that he can’t associate or talk with any organized crime figures. “Lucky had all the politicians and even the Vatican heads in his pocket. He was making $55 to $100 million a week and when Vegas opened the money really started to roll in.
“He got Frank Sinatra and many others like Marylin Monroe, Tony Bennett, Dean Martin, Clint Eastwood, Sammy Davis started in Hollywood. He then would take a percentage of their earnings and this went on for their entire careers.
“Remember, the horse’s head being cut-off in Godfather I and then put in the Hollywood producer’s bed? That really happened and it had to do with forcing a Hollywood producer to star Sinatra in one of his movies.”.......”.

(§) “Il papato e l'impero” edited by Rubbettino publising house; different contributions from various authors assembled by Gabriele de Rosa and Giorgio Cracco. This is a common work of historians on the history of the papacy in various ages. It is not a work of “insiders”, it simply contains common knowledge which is material of usual studies in the university and academies. Of course history is heavily monopolized by Rome. And it is not sure that we always shall benefit from these common sources without to see 'em heavily manipulated by the religious censorship of Rome. Her censorship hides itself always under an “ideological alibi”, of left or of right wing political creed. See the last efforts to build other legions of intellectuals dealing with the vital question of the Holocaust – is the rehabilitation of the Roman Catholic corporal of Austria near?
Friday, February 19, 2010 "Ledochowski Holocaust Morality & Complicity":
“.....The Committee on Church Relations and the Holocaust (CRC) of the United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum announces a seminar for professors of theology,
ethics, and religion at theological schools and other institutions of advanced
education. Applications from interested professors from other disciplines will
be considered.....”.

(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

The “Drei Freddy Krueger” populating the sleeps of Leo XIII

During the reign of Leo XIII the New York Times wrote in an article about the course of the papacy (*):

“.....The Papacy since 1870 has been in a position where practically everything turns upon the personality of the Pontiff and his choice of advisers. There can be no more mediocre Popes under whose nominal guidance matters can go on in commonplace routine. Every successor of Peter now must make a big mark in the history of the Church for good or bad. If he is not very strong, he will be found lamentably weak. There is no longer any middle course.
Leo has been one of the strong kind. His fourteen years of reign have been devoted to building a new sort of Papacy beside rather than upon the ruins of the old structure. Considering the great difficulties and obstacles in the way of his task, proceeding even more from within than without, the result is exceptionally successful. Perhaps the outcome of his labors is best described by saying that he has shown those who thought the Papacy need no longer be taken into account in the world’s affairs because Rome has been wrestled from it that they were profoundly mistaken. The Vatican to-day wields far greater influence in Europe than it has done before since the French Revolution.....”

Let's start with a minor fact.

There was a meticulous perseverance in the hate against Hapsburg Austria. This hate went well beyond the narrow borders of the reaction for a world still marked by the ancient Feudal system and devoted to the church of Rome. The true target of that hate surpassed the initial purposes which were inscribed in the instinctive reaction against what we can term as “reactionary regime”. The hate has been, with a patient work of cultivation worth of a Bonsai master, turned against that superficial reactionary crust of the Hapsburg Austria, and using the alibi of the oppressive central government of Vienna, it has been used to destroy the same core of the entire Austrian world. The logical phases of the game were identical to the ones applied to Russia. There the Bolsheviks, here, in Austria, the Masonry and the Liberals.

To continue to spread excrements over the top of the historical figure of the imperial throne of the Hapsburg, is a sport that today implies less dangers than a poker match against your PC. The sport of course was and is proudly considered in the patriotic literature as fruit of the Italian creativity because it was invented in the Italian enclave in Hapsburg Austria, the city of Trieste of the middle XIX century.
“Merda all’Austria!” or “Shit to Austria!”, was the courageous cry of battle of those little galaxy of militant irredentists, built up with former Garibaldi’s volunteers, delinquents, agents of the Savoy reign, who were considered then by the author Giulio Cesari as – righteously - the first true Fascists. Also in those times that sport was not so dangerous as one would imagine. To cause a violent riot in the city of Trieste, to attack, in violent demonstrations, the consulate of the Vatican city and the seat of the bishop in the most important harbour of the “Roman Catholic Apostolic empire”, causing the murder of two people among whom an Austrian imperial soldier, to cause subversion against the Hapsburg authority arising the hate between ethnic communities, to prepare the subversion with a planned, open conspiracy involving the higher Italian authorities of the civil government of the city, to instruct and organize squads of ‘volunteers’ who would have instigated riots, armed with ponjards, with rockets to signalise the coordination of the attacks realized with what today is considered “modern strategy of urban guerrilla”, with sticks with leaded top, guns and revolvers whose bullets flew near the head of some military and police officials (as they reported in the police documents), well, all that, in the “reactionary Austria at the service of the papacy”, all that costed to the ‘liberal’, ‘anticlerical’ heroes of the Italian Irredentism, just only (§) four condemnations, the maximum of both amounted to the appalling number of twelve (12) months of jail (to spend in the city prison of those times which, cause its origin, its historical building was named and also today even if has been dismissed by a century, keeps the name “dai Gesuiti” or “by the Jesuits”).

And all that in the year of the Lord 1868, not in the 1968 of the Sorbonne’s riots and of the demonstrations for Che Guevara.

All that indicates firmly that also the ‘liberal’, ‘anticlerical’ and anti-Slav Irredentists of the ‘cosmopolitan’ city of Trieste had their brave saint protector, the saint who protects the assaulter of the bishop seats from the police oppression of a ‘reactionary regime’ who formally was at the service of those the same bishops. Those aggressors had a saint because you know that the church of Rome could be very generous, and can pardon even the ones who the most wounded her infinite patient, especially if those wounds then will demonstrate to be the irreplaceable means to wipe away powerful enemies or old allies who became a dangerous obstacle for the religious dominance in Europe and in the world. Probably the image of the saint to adore was seated in that church dedicated to the Mother – pardon – to the Father of all the Cornerstones. Four years before the ‘anticlerical’ and anti-Slovenian violence in the city of Trieste, Giuseppe Mazzini, the Masonic spiritual father of those little galaxy of heroes subverting Trieste, built in London the Romanist saint Peter church (***).

It had and have a certain importance to spread metaphorically organic biological wastes over the figure of the Hapsburg Kaiser. Because the imperial top of Austria was only the point of departure in order to let then pour the spiritual faeces also over other powers and dynasties who were strictly in contact with the Hapsburg crown for the common interests in the foreign policy. The Hapsburgs and the empire were accepting without discussion the Roman Catholicism for what it appeared to be. But not for what it hid inside. Of course opportunistic exchanges was also the norm. No more or less than the opportunistic exchanges between courageous ‘heretics’ and not-spoken interests of Rome which led to the flourishing of ecumenical Switzerland in the same time meanwhile Lutheran Germany and Prussia were going to be buried alive. Austria was the religious arm for excellence of Rome, but at the same time it was a secular body, with a language and an hearth and material interests in common with the other Northern German cousin, the Second Reich under the Protestant Prussia leadership. How those communion of sentiments and interests would have entered in conflict with the Kaiserliche religious mission of Roman Catholic evangelisation (“Apostolic” was the attribute of the Kaiser) for the triumph of the papacy? Precisely this was the nightmare of Rome. After having used for centuries (millenniums if we start from Sumeria or ancient Egypt), the secular state entities like healthy carrier to spread the church and the occult system of pagan magician power controlling it all around the world, Rome, with an indescribable terror, discovered that she could have been treated exactly like she treated the others. The parasite could have been used by the same victim.

The sudden change of the policy of Rome after the election of Leo XIII gave an evidence about the existence of such nightmares, which can be also traced down in the common historiography of the papacy of those times. But what I want to do in this seat, is to gave a name to that nightmare, a name that, as regard those few sources by me consulted, has been never mentioned by the academic historians, even if they recalled it in a very dangerous contiguity with the exposition of the troubles shacking the Vatican foreign policy. This name is: “The Three Emperors Agreement”.

The Agreement among three Emperors was built by chancellor Otto von Bismarck in 1872 and its purpose was the creation of a balance among the three continental powers of Eurasia, based on the bloodlines of the Hapsburg family, of the Hohenzollern family and of the Romanov family. How was considering this balance of powers, the Vatican, in the secret thought of its cardinals and Jesuits controllers? Do we corrupt so much the reality if we say that that agreement was considered by the papacy with the same sentiments of Dracula when facing the holy water and the cross?
From Amber Path North, to Amber Path South and continuing all along the Balkans till the Ottoman Turkey, we have a concentrate of religious borders and differences who represents by a side the infinite appetite and by the other its reverse, the infinite terror of the Vatican. The appetite of course was that ocean of schismatic Orthodoxies which would have represented a fabulous plunder to grasp in order to increase the democratic weight of the Vatican Catholicism in the world and so to definitively push in a corner the Protestant heresy. But the nightmare was rising from the observation that the keys to open that immense religious caveau, were entirely in the hands of secular bloodlines, who had the bollocks necessary to resist against the callings of the Prostitute on the 7 Hills. Those bloodlines preferred to treat the question among themselves, and the intelligent choice started to materialize just in that Three Emperors Agreement promoted by the very powerful Protestant Prussia based Second Reich.
With that treaty the Robber of Rome discovered that the tool of the Hapsburg “Apostolic” Kaiserreich was practically useless. The religious questions of the Balkans became matter of discussion among the three emperors and Rome, literally, was pushed outside the door. To think that the Hapsburg crown should have followed the desires of the pope to Roman-Catholicize the schismatic Balkans, it would have meant to push Hapsburg against Romanov. And Protestant Hohenzollern together with the schismatic Romanov. The memory of 1866 was still near. To ask the Hapsburg emperor the realization of a suicidal war in order to obtain what he would have obtained with only an intelligent “gentlemen’s agreement” between three imperial dynasties, was surely considered an abominable idiocy not only by the same pro-papacy Austrian court, but by the same most lucid Vatican cardinals' and Jesuits' minds.

So it came Leo XIII, XIII like that 13th of July 1868 when the Masonic hand of Rome pushed her Irredentist mob to riot in Trieste. Leo XIII’s policy was aimed to subtract from the influence of that cursed alliance the object of the agreement, the religious coffer lying in the Balkans. From this instant it is possible to trace the events of the Balkans in the last 150 years, and with the “dead or alive” urgency of the Vatican we can finally understand the motive for the continue state of war in and for the bloodshed of the Balkans, from the ethnic cleansing performed by the Fascists in the twenties, to the last, still at work, ethnic cleansing against the Serbs in Kosovo.
Of consequence, in the Hapsburg Austria’s mind the thought to proceed autonomously in the Balkan was, if not absent, very weak. To move chess in the Balkan would have meant the immediate entry in action of Russia. Russia would have asked Germany about its intentions on the Balkans. And Germany, whose natural aerial of expansion, together Austria, were the Balkans, would have not hurt the Romanov as they could have well found in the Roman Catholic and with enormous thirsty of revenge (after Sedan) France a valid ally in a war against Protestant led Germany. Not for a casual coincidence, the first king of Yugoslavia was a sort of fulfilment of that French thirsty of revenge. Peter I of monarchic Yugoslavia fought on the side of the Frenchmen in the 1870 war against Germany. A wonderful example on how Rome is able to use even the defeats of her allies and the thirsty of revenge as fuel for her evil designs.

The troubles of 1878 confirmed the deadly threat to Rome carried by the Three Emperors Agreement. With the defeat of the Ottoman empire by Russia and the sequent Saint Stephan treaty, the principal Schismatic Christian nations of the Balkans acquired independence, among them of course Serbia. But Russia didn't respect previous agreements with Austria, and didn't allow to the Hapsburg empire to enter in Bosnia Herzegovina as established in previous agreements in case of defeat of the Ottoman empire. Again war was in the air. Bismarck immediately started to work in order to save the Three Emperors Agreement, with success. Roman Catholic Austria obtained the administration of Bosnia Hercegovina and other near regions. Without to pass through Vatican, but thanks to a direct accord, wanted and managed by a Protestant chancellor, with a Schismatic empire.

Feeling that the Triple Agreement was a trap squeezing her ambitions of religious domain and supremacy on the temporal power, Rome started to act outside the strict traditional accord with her by-now useless Hapsburg tool. The desires of Rome to directly deal with the Schismatics, traditionally under Russian protection, bypassing the Hapsburg crown, was pure sand-in-the-eyes for Austria which realized that all her autonomy from Rome in foreign political and religious affairs could have been in its turn transformed in an useless heavy wreckage. Vienna immediately started, if not an open policy of resistance against the new unexpected autonomous aggressive course of Rome, at least to put obstacles and denials when dealing common objects of foreign political activity with the Vatican.
Probably the new ambitious and shameless foreign policy of Vatican was just present in some minds-who-counts (Jesuits?) during the previous reign of Pious IX and even before. Using the bridles of the reactionary clerical politic from a side and of the enlightened liberal Masonic new age from the other side (double-opposed-forces dialectic), Rome could control the politic of the Hapsburg horse probably till the point to transform it in a steer to be sent in the 1914-1918 slaughterhouse.

It was having in mind this spectral presence, another true Ghost wandering all along Eurasia, that the papacy and its Jesuits controllers afforded the second half of the XIX century and the beginning of the sequent century. At the end of the First World conflict that triple headed Ghost was definitively disappeared, and this little detail of the modern history should indicate, somehow or other, that in the outburst of first Eurasian carnage the responsibility of the Vatican was decisively not secondary respect the one of any other actor on the scene. The Hapsburg “Apostolic” Kaiser who insolently dared to extend his historical imperial rights of appointment of the bishops even to the episcopate of Belgrade, the Romanov who were the traditional protectors of that religious safe filled with schismatic Christians called “Balkans region”, the Hohenzollern dinasty who dared to openly slap the face of Loyola with the glove of the Bismarck's Kulturkampf, well, after 1918, these Triple Freddy Krueger Agreement who was infesting with the nightmares the sleeps of the popes, vanished with the first silences between the trenches.

Then Wladimir Ledochowsky entered in action and picked up a just existing baton. The 26th General superior of the Jesuit order was simply the right person at the right moment with the right heritage of personal revenge to be applied as “inscrutable design of God” to change the world for the triumph of Rome. All that was not a point of arrival, it was just the point of departure for a deeper purge (the deepest within historical living memory) to which Eurasia will be submitted by the Jesuits' army and by the Vatican, a purge which will transform the once multi-religious Amber Path and Balkans region, in a long strip with the both extremes, the Protestant North and the Schismatic South, transformed in a desert, meanwhile only the Roman Catholic centre remained an oasis nearly untouched after nearly hundred years of religious carnages. Of evil designs of the church of Rome.

(§) Correction 18 Feb 2010: I forget to verify the source about the condemned people in consequence of the Facts of July 1868. No, they were not two people condemned at a max 6 months of jail, but four people: one at 1 year jail, two at 6 months jail and one at 1 month jail; also in this case the amount of the penalty was simply ridicolous respect the criminal devastations.
And of course I changed the wrongly quoted "Washington Post" with the correct newspaper, "New York Times". See the second comment of Douglas Willinger below.

(*) The article has been reported by Douglas Willinger's Continuing Counter Reformation blog - Thursday, October 11, 2007 "The New York Times On the Papacy and Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowsk":

(**) Tuesday, September 29, 2009 "Fatti di Luglio 1868":

(***) Sunday, May 24, 2009 "Romish Masonic Giuseppe Mazzini, another Jesuit priest?":
“....Mazzini arrived in London in early 1837, where he scratched a meagre living writing reviews. He settled in Clerkenwell which had become known as "Little Italy" due to the influx of Italian political refugees. Mazzini set up a free school for Italian children in Hatton Garden in 1841.Thanks to Mazzini's efforts, the Italian Church of St Peter in Clerkenwell was built in 1864 and still stands today . Mazzini increased his revolutionary contacts during the next few years and in 1840 established a workingmen's association. The later Mazzini Garibaldi club in Red Lion Square was a social club for Italian working men. It was an important venue from its establishment in 1864 until it closed in 2008....”

(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

De-crypting the Democratic language of the Counter Reformation

From Craig Oxely’ forum:

The Venetian Republic was the first type of free society ever to exist in Europe,
and it was destroyed by the Jesuits. The Jesuits ruined by homeland. Sometimes I cry when I walk
through Venice. We were a superpower! Everybody came to Venice to escape exetremists and
dictators and tyrannts.

Venice was like America.


Since the French and American revolution the monarchic power based on families knew no else than a constant decline which led to the full extinction of the typical Middle Age society. But the Middle Age in itself is not yet disappeared. At the opposite, for a paradox, the Middle Age expresses itself just in this kind of extinction. To properly declare the complete extinction of the Middle Age we should observe the contemporary vanishing of the other pillar of the medieval societies, but this pillar, instead to follow the monarchies in their destiny, enlarged, strengthened and spread in the world thanks just to that extinction of the secular monarchic pillar. This second pillar is the Vatican and its universal presence in the society named “church of Rome”.

So when we hear today – as well yesterday – a blatant praise for the defeat of the old order of Europe based on the aristocracy, the suspect should sharpen our critical faculties. The enlightened propaganda mixes in the same pot any kind of aristocracy and nobility, melting their goals and finalities, in order to contaminate that part of the Medieval monarchic world, which still had a positive role as dam against the arrogance of Rome, with the infamies of that portion of the aristocracy which supported Rome till the end of its days . It works always in this way: mix a drop of coffee in a glass of milk, and the candid white disappear for ever.

It’s a matter of fact and not an hypothesis that Rome saw among her the most fierce enemies just the same concept of “bloodline”. The Vatican knows that the blood tie is the strongest among the bonds in the human society, and the prohibition of the marriage for their priests explains that. If to be a priest it means that you married the church and hence you cannot betray your ‘wife’, if that – with unwanted self irony – spiritual marriage has the prominence on every marriage or human relation on the earth, it is a logical consequence that the Enemy N. 1 of Rome is the family tout-court and its natural, spontaneous tying force, a force that incessantly constitutes a threat to the discipline of her system of dominance. All that not only explains the obsessive presence of homosexuality and pedophilia inside the church of Rome (forget please the recent cosmetic opportunistic condemnation of it by pope Ratzinger), whose role is to be the infective vector to weaken the basis of the generic human community based on the family and hence on the blood ties, whatever could be the social class, the ethnic belonging etc. All that is a theme worth of a dedicated blog and it is linked with the racial war pursued with immigration. What interests in this seat is to render clear how Rome, with indefatigable constance, worked to destroy the other pillar of the reign of Christ on earth, the temporal pillar based on the material noble bloodline.

The considerations I am doing here are very simple and obvious, but I don’t remember to have met them in any forum dedicated to the “evil church of Rome”. Years ago I posted a self made translation about the Orsini/Odescalchi/Bracciano castle where the wedding of Tom Cruise with don’t-remember-whom were celebrated following the Scientology ritual. That post of mine was then picked up by Craig Oxley in the Orsini’s (Maximus) thread without to see the truth in it. I too was not completely aware of what that news was really communicating, and only at years of distance I realized that. That post was based on a short description of events occurred in that castle during the Middle Age. The wife of the owner, Isabella de Medici, was famous for the lovers she had. The legend says that she usually wore transparent dresses during meetings with other members of the aristocracy. After she ended the sexual act with a lover – says the legend - she provoked his death with a fall inside an hidden hole near her room. The husband then killed her. As you can see the framing of the adversaries was a very common means of diplomacy – not only in the today’s Bohemian Groove. So that enlightens us about the environment of that aristocracy: perversion, corruption, decadence, satanism, exoterism which were (are) pervading the Italian bloodlines. But what I was not realizing is the fact that those perversions (and related usual occultism) were a formidable tool of Rome to infect and weaken aristocracy. If you go in the Saturnalia section of The Unhived Mind forum, you see an entire encyclopedia about the pagan exoterism of Rome linked with the cult of the stars and of the sexuality. But what is not clear is that this pagan cult couldn’t work without the opposite cult of the sexual morality and religious decency in the public costumes. All that pagan satanic exoterism was created and developed to destroy from the inside the reigning bloodlines turning natural instinct against natural instinct. Cardinals of Rome and the Black Nobility of course don't believe that if you drink wine added with the urine of a virgin in the skull of a Jew you acquire a magical power. So, after having inexorably infected the core of the monarchies, the infection was exposed to the hammer of the public double-moral of the church to receive the final deadly hit. The inner corrosion of the aristocratic world was in this way leaving the space free only for the church of Rome and those few Black Nobility bloodlines controlling (or controlled by?) it.

(Of course Rome still needs to parasite the services that only structures founded on the blood tie can supply. Today the aristocracy has been substituted by another blood tie, more adapt to the goals of Rome and especially more controllable and less dangerous: the spreading in the society of Mafia, Camorra, Ndrangheta etc. are an example of that).

The role of the Masonry, “Free” or not doesn’t matter, is clear when we see the relation “church of Rome/secular aristocracy or nobility” with the most appropriate lenses of a merciless struggle hidden under the appearance of a collaboration between temporal and spiritual power. Masonry has been clearly developed not simply to control that “temporal arm” of Christ, but especially to act as health vector of satanism, occultism, perversion in other words of the virus of decadence and moral corrosion. All that is perfectly confirmed by what we are assisting today: with the end of Romanov, Hohenzollern, Hapsburg, and especially with the definitive end of the last residual traces of that old religious and spiritual Eurasian order, the useless tool of Masonry has become a barrack to demolish. When possible its wreckage is recycled to build stories filled with an ocean of details to confuse the minds. See for example the revelations in the recent years about the secret role of the Masonry in this or that event, to what lodge belongs that politicians, and what did Frederic the Great, etc. Like the armored shelters of the Titan II. Now that they are useless and dismissed, they can be exposed, together their queer symbolic technology, to the public. Discounts shall be applied to school companies.

We can now start to tie all the threads launched in this short analysis. The role of the Masonry in the French and American revolutions (don’t think only to Masonic Washington, but to the very probable visit of General Superior in Washington D.C. in the most crucial years) is more evident now. Rome thinks always following great schemes, designs, ages of time. Well beyond the narrow time border of the life of their members. She doesn’t need of Sun Tzu manual of war because she uses the force of the enemy as a weapon to turn against him at least since her foundation. Better than Ju Jitzu. The same initial Christendom, with its soft but invincible power, was monopolized by the Satanist priests of Rome and used as formidable not-conventional weapon to demolish the most hard fortress. All that you know under the definition: “birth of Roman Catholic Apostolic church of Rome”. With the Modern Age it is possible to identify another epochal changing provoked by the Vatican as epochal battering ram to destroy - under the disguise of a “irreversible time line of the progress” - the ancient bi-polar order. When at the beginning of XVI century Rome definitively realized that the temporal sword was in hands which were not simply competitors for the power in a game which was formally respecting the same theological basis of Rome, but were openly denying the same rules of the theological game and hence the reasons of existence of the master of the game, she improved her not-conventional weapon, added another stage to it and worked hard to create a Multiple Re-entry Vehicle warhead for it. The shock wave of the multiple explosions of that Vatican-Masonic MIRV is known today under the image of that cultural, ideological, political long wave that changed the face and the mind of the earth since the end of XVIII century. It destroyed the last rests of the old order transforming it in a colorless desert of dust named: “Democracy” alias “the dictatorship of the majority” alias “the dictatorship of the mastermind behind majority”.

For not a blind and casual coincidence I choose that excerpt from The Unhived Mind. If the clash “Temporal power/Spiritual power” could have been represented also on the physic geographical map, it is only the Amber Path South, where the Vatican peninsula was bordering the Empire with the Republic of Venice, that can give material substance to the image. And in the same essence of the political power of Venice it is contained the embryo of that future weapon of war to get the final victory on the Temporal sword. Praises to the “freedom” and of the “republic”, when are separated from the past and especially actual context of the Continuing Counter Reformation war, are betraying the ideological use for which they have been created. From the appearance of a true praise for the Freedom, such rhetorical slogan easily can be implemented in the “freedom from any temporal containment of the theological power of Rome”. Far from being a true praise of a political regime free from the oppression of an absolutist monarchy, it can be turned in a praise of a society deprived of a strong power based on the blood tie, whose interests are absolutely not knelt to the designs of Rome and hence are the only valid dam able to contain them.
Don’t worry so if today Venice and her ‘freedom’ is coming back from the grave. The Vatican marketing of today recycles the old wreckage used in the past to weaken the theological enemies. The first military goal for the Jesuit order is to destroy in the society – in all societies, any valid point of reference which could resist to the religious wars of the Vatican. It is for this reason that today you assist to all these celebrations for freedom and democracy, because their appearance (manipulated in the case of the freedom, genuine in the case of democracy) is used to hide a project for a weak, pliant, passive and effeminate society. Without those masculine attributes able to stop a chaos generated and controlled by invisible hands of Rome. The sexual allusion of the falling towers of Manhattan are at the same time a truth and a lie: a truth as concern the destruction of every masculine attribute in the society and in the culture, a lie because are only those temporal religious worlds which don't recognize the pope as their absolute master that have to fall like those towers or: to become effeminate. Meanwhile Rome wears only superficially the pliant dresses of the 'tolerance' and of 'democracy', conserving in her most deep invisible core the assassin masculine attitude of Constantine.

To conclude this short sequence of considerations I quoted other sources which I hope will help to make you understand the true unspoken motives which, often in an unaware way, pushes to embrace a simplistic ideological propaganda. The excerpts below come from the usual Wikipedia and are contained in the German page on Martin Luther. They are not revealing secret information but are common knowledge which, if linked with other information we have about the world, can reveal us what maybe an entire company of insiders would never tell us. I translated the most important passages of the entirely quoted texts (corsive characters), to not break the logical unity. If you want you can put it in a translation machine and read it entirely. The comment of those excerpts? You just read it above.
So pardon me if I am using a vernacular terminology, but it is something more than a picturesque image to say that for more than a millennium of religious war, Rome literally worked to deprive the bloodlines of their testicles, in order to kneel their force based on the biological blood tie. And fulfilled this mission for greater part with the diplomacy and the false friendship instead with a frank enmity. In consequence a society deprived by its ‘bollocks’ is the goal of Rome, and Venice, where the ‘bollocks' if not absent where at least very weak, is a good model of Rome's moral concept of governance - to install in the human mind. When nations and countries lose their hard attributes, Rome can well lavish to them the consolation of the democracy. And to tolerate any kind of heresy, because when you have no more bollocks, you know well what you can do with your heresy......

Konsolidierung der Reformation

Seit 1525 verlor die Reformation ihren Charakter als Volksbewegung und wurde zur Angelegenheit der Landesfürsten, die aus der Niederlage der Bauern gestärkt hervorgingen. Konsequenz der Zwei-Reiche-Lehre wäre eigentlich ein völliger Neuaufbau der Kirche auf alleiniger Basis der reformatorischen Theologie gewesen. Luther hielt jedoch wie die meisten Zeitgenossen eine konfessionelle Vielfalt innerhalb eines Territoriums für undurchführbar und empfahl Andersgläubigen, auszuwandern. Da sich in deutschsprachigen Gebieten zunächst kein katholischer Bischof der Reformation anschloss und eine willkürliche Ausgrenzung Andersgläubiger für Luther von Gott verbotene Amtsanmaßung war, bat er 1525 den sächsischen Kurfürsten darum, als herausragendes Mitglied der Kirche deren Visitation, also die Überprüfung des Klerus auf Glaubenstreue und Amtsführung im Sinne des Evangeliums, anzuordnen. Dieses pragmatische und situationsbedingte Notkonzept wurde bald zur Regel in evangelischen Gebieten und begünstigte dort die Entwicklung zu konfessionellen Landeskirchen, die von den Landesfürsten geschützt, aber auch gelenkt und abhängig waren.

“….As in the German speaking lands at the beginning any Catholic bishop joined the Reformation and an arbitrary exclusion of other believers (?) for Luther was a not legitimate exercise of power by God forbidden, he prayed in 1525 the Electing prince of Saxony to exercise, in the quality of distinguished member of the church, the power of inspection of it, and also the verification upon the fidelity to the belief and the conduit in the administration of the clerics as concerns the Evangelical finality. This pragmatic and by the contingency-dictated practice became soon the rule in the Evangelical lands and facilitated the development of confessional land churches which were protected by the prince of the land, but were also led by him and depending from him.

Reformatorische Hauptschriften

An den christlichen Adel

An den christlichen Adel deutscher Nation von des christlichen Standes Besserung

Mit dieser Adelsschrift wendet sich Luther auf Deutsch an die weltlichen Fürsten, denen er die Durchführung der reformatorischen Maßnahmen übertragen will, da die Bischöfe darin nach seiner Meinung versagt haben. Luther argumentiert, dass sich die Romanisten vor der Reformation hinter drei Mauern verstecken: 1. Sie stellen die kirchliche Obrigkeit über die weltliche. 2. Wenn die Reformation mit Hilfe der Bibel begründet wird, verweisen sie darauf, dass nur der Papst das Recht hat, die Bibel endgültig auszulegen. 3. Soll zu Auslegungszwecken oder Reformationsbemühungen ein Konzil einberufen werden, wird darauf verwiesen, dass nur der Papst das Recht dazu besitze. Damit stehe der Papst über dem Konzil.
Außerdem schlägt Luther in der Schrift ein politisches Reformprogramm vor. So soll Bildung allen zugänglich sein, nicht nur dem Klerus. Der Zölibat und der Kirchenstaat sollen abgeschafft, das Zinsnehmen eingeschränkt und das Betteln verboten werden. Dafür soll es eine geregelte Armenfürsorge geben.
Luthers diesbezügliche Ansichten beendeten den Gegensatz von Staat und Kirche, der das Mittelalter geprägt hatte; die Fürsten wurden zu uneingeschränkten Beherrschern der neuen Staatskirchen. Erst 1918 endete dieser Zustand in Deutschland.

“The the Christian nobility

To the Christian nobility of the German nation on the improving of the Christian condition/class

With this noble script Luther addresses in German language the secular princes, to whom he delivers the realization of the Reform's instructions, because in that duty the bishops – in his opinion – failed.


The opinion of Luther related to that closed the contrast between the state and the church, a contrast that shaped the Middle Age; the princes became absolute lords of the new state churches. Only in 1918 ended this condition in Germany.


The denial of the freedom to operate for the arrogance of Rome and the building of an absolute obstacle for her evil designs needs of men with bollocks, not with democracy:

(A short observation. Venice as refugee for the persecuted ones of Europe? Strange, it seems that brother Primož Trubar, persecuted by Rome in the bordering Carniola, was not aware of such Venetian hospitality, and preferred to fled in the Homeland of the Tyrannies, Germany. Even if he was introduced to the heresy by a very important bishop of the church of Rome... )

(**) The excerpts come from the page whose upgrade is dated 6th February (“Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am 6. Februar 2010 um 12:08 Uhr geändert.”) at the address:

(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

Friday, February 5, 2010

Who Killed the Empire?

28 Zweischwerterlehre. Gott verleiht dem Papst und dem Kaiser ein Schwert. Der Kaiser hält dem Papst die Steigbügel (1295/ij6j, Dresdner Bilderhandschrift des Sachsenspiegels)

The most important changing of the strategic deployment on the field leading to the destruction of both German and Austrian bloodlines in the first conflict, was the sudden betrayal of Italy to the Triple Alliance pact which was signed by Italy, Austria and Germany.

After the alliance of forty-five years before, with the Prussian ally, during the war that led to the capture of Rome, Italy betrayed the core of the old ally allowing so the end of the "Central empire" system.

All that today continue to be presented in some historical versions as the defeat of right arm of the Vatican, identifying the defeat of the central empires with only the end of a reigning Roman Catholic bloodline and avoiding to underline that also the most powerful Protestant bloodline in the continent and perhaps in the world was liquidated at the end of that conflict.

The role of Roman Catholic and with Masonic-costume-dressed Italian country was to supply Protestant Prussia with a false friend who, at the hour X, would have turned his back to the ally. The hour X came and it struck on the 3rd August 1914. In that day it started the catastrophe for the entire German world, whose unity was feared by Rome not less than a rat fear an hungry cat.

When the smokes of the war started to disappear, the great British empire had free hand in the Atlantic Ocean and a competitor less in the Mediterranean sea. And the heretic lands North to the Alps were finally deprived by a valid defender against the revenge of Rome. If this is not an agreement, I don't know the human word to correctly term that and I don't think I'll ask for it to Edmund Paris.

Remember that the true explosive mix able to disintegrate the thirsty of power of the Vatican in the world was not the Royal fleet of an Anglican crown without power of interference in the inner life of the Vatican theocratic monarchy. The true explosive was originated by the assonance of two tremendous nightmares. One was the old imperial privilege - inherited by the Hapsburg bloodline - to interfere in the appointment of every pope. It was something more important than the usual veto granted to all the Roman Catholic dynasties in the elections of the new pope. It was a real “imprimatur” or consent. The second nightmare of course was the Lutheran essence of Protestant Prussia. The joining and the assonance of both nightmares would have meant for the Vatican the materialization of such an indescribable horror like the one represented by a Lutheran super-power able to put vetoes on any election of a pope through imperial privileges...

You think that's nothing?

Austria and Prussia were lucky because at those times Einstein and Oppenheimer were only well knit student of physic and especially not Vatican citizens. Because Rome would have had any doubt about a preventive nuclear strike on Wien and Berlin to push away the Mother of all the Nightmares.

But the usual Jesuit Machiavellism (with annexed opportunistic false suicides of sons and heirs of Emperors?) which intensely operated in the Vatican presided Austria, resulted unsuccessful, hence Rome launched her H-bomb “First World Conflict” whose theological fallout killed immediately any imperial privilege and any Lutheran bloodline.

It is revealing the strange absence of considerations on this aspect of that European reality, a silence well disguised by the noise of the fashion of the moment, which tends to identify in a too much hasty (to avoid suspects) judgment the defeat of a Roman Catholic imperial bloodline – Hapsburg - as it was a deadly hit to Rome the same. But Rome the same – I can imagine it – can be very generous and pay with a tacit opportunist agreement those 'heretics' who, apparently, are attacking her, but are silent about her the most terrible nightmares.


Archduchess Regina von Habsburg, who died on February 3 aged 85, was the wife of Dr Otto von Habsburg – formerly Crown Prince of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and latterly a highly respected member of the European parliament; had history taken a different turn, she would have been Empress of Austria and Queen of Hungary.

Archduchess Regina von Habsburg

The Archduchess with her husband, Dr Otto von Habsburg, at a mass to mark their 50th wedding anniversary in 2001
Photo: EPA

Christened Regina Helene Elisabeth Margarete, she was born in Würzburg, Germany, on January 6 1925, the youngest of four daughters of Prince Georg, the titular Duke Georg III of Saxe-Meiningen, and his wife, Countess Klara-Marie von Korff genannt Schmissing-Kerssenbrock. Her father, who had joined the Nazi party in 1933, died in a Russian prisoner-of-war camp at Chernopevetz a year after the war ended, when she was 21. Her sister died at only three months old, while one of her brothers, Prince Anton Ulrich, was killed in action at Albert-sur-Somme in 1940. Another became a Carthusian monk at Grande Chartreuse in Grenoble.

Further back, her great-grandfather was Georg II, Duke of Saxe-Meiningen (1826-1914), who after the Franco-Prussian War became a well-known patron of the theatre, and is sometimes described as having been the first modern stage director – he is remembered particularly for developing the Meiningen Ensemble, using his court theatre and designing costumes and props himself.


Leo XIII, pope from 1878 to 1903

Rudolf, Kronprinz von Österreich-Ungarn (* 21. August 1858 auf Schloss Laxenburg; † 30. Jänner 1889 auf Schloss Mayerling)

1919 / Versailles, Frankreich Gruppenaufnahme der Teilnehmer der Friedenskonferenz von Versailles (1. Reihe von rechts): Woodrow Wilson (USA), George Clemenceau (Frankreich), David Lloyd George (England) und Naron Sonnino (Italien).

Corrections - 08th Feb 2010: instead to read ".. were finally deprived by a valid defender against the hungry of Rome...." read: "..... were finally deprived by a valid defender against the revenge of Rome.......". Please, respect the roles.
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Once upon a time, in Amber Path North...

Yes, I purposely used a definition which is disrespectful for the German sense of national belonging. In fact Protestant Prussia should be considered a legitimate part of Germany before to be a part of Amber Path. Hence I should have mentioned this nation, and not an historical and geographical name which today identifies a century of tribulation. But are the Germans today worth of such respect? Who does sincerely care today, in Germany, about that old wreckage, Protestant Prussia? Prussia today is like those rotten bones threw to the dogs to excite them against the prey. Today Lutheran Prussia is remembered only when the figure of Roman Catholic Hitler has to be rehabilitated. Well, if this is the rule of the game, I'll adapt to it, and surely I too will not recall Prussia for its kitchen specialties.

But more than a dog, they resemble rats. And in this period of the year the ideological rats of the Holocaust Denial are excited. Every January and February there's the usual sacrificial rite of the “Devouring of the Holocaust Cheese”. The celebrations have been thought with a special timing. At the beginning,
on the 27th January, the Mother of All the Ratlines, Rome, shows the Cheese. To excite the appetite of the animals and to instigate their jaws, the cheese has been aromatized with the spices of the lie in order to make resemble it to “the Cheese of the Lie”. And the blood of the children of Gaza has been sprinkled on it by the Romanist elite of Israel – the maid of Rome. With the same punctuality of the altar boy announcing with the smoke of the incense the priest some feet back of him. Then, after two weeks, the Holocaust Cheese is offered to the teeth of the Denial rats, who shall devour it from the 11st to the 14th days of February.

So every year you have the same scheme and the same ritual sacrifices offered to the gods. I don't have better words to describe it. Not for a case the “P” of Prussia has been substituted today, in the imaginary of the world, with the “P” of Palestine (Another “P2”?). The Protestant Holocaust is shadowed by the “Palestinian Holocaust”. And yet they are strictly linked, but the same ideological Denial rats seem to not realize it. Maybe the reason is lying in the fact that Mohammad (or those Vatican magicians in his name) funded Islam on a difference from the cult of the church of Rome – the nature of Jesus Christ as prophet instead as saviour - and not on the explicit, frank and clear denial of the holiness of the church of Rome the same, as did Martin Luther and and as it was the funding Faith of that first Lutheran state in the world.

Well, its just to forget it, that the Holocaust Cheese has been filled also with the spices of other victims of Rome: from the ethnic cleansing of the Italians in East Adriatic coast to the stake of Dresden – victims of the last dirty war of Counter Reformation in Amber Path. After every 27th January the souls are excited and the teeth are ready to plunge into the cheese. I too once, for a period of time, was enjoying of this ritual, but then I realized that my life is worth to be lived for most important thing than to let it be prey of the instincts of a rat. So I will continue to enjoy this period of the year but celebrating another disappeared world, a world free from the most hateful rats of Rome. Hence let me say (sorry, Germans), like in those legendary tales: “Once upon a time in Amber Path North, there it existed the glorious first Lutheran state in the world...”From Douglas Willinger's Continuing Counter Reformation blog - the true Ghost of Europe, Lutheran Prussia:


Amber Path North: Oder-Neisse Fallout

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Over Wlodimir Ledochowski's 'aim' of the counter reformation, resulting in the 'transfer' of millions of primarily Protestant peoples from the lands of pre-1945 Eastern Germany

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Goal 'Prophesized' by Maximillian Kolbe

East Prussia- Europe's 1st Lutheran State (1525),_Duke_of_Prussia


(German: Albrecht; Latin: Albertus; 16 May 1490 – 20 March 1568) was the 37th Grand Master of the Teutonic Knights and, after converting to Lutheranism, the first duke of the Duchy of Prussia, which was the first state to adopt the Lutheran faith and Protestantism as the official state religion. Albert proved instrumental in the political spread of Protestantism in its early stage.

Yalta division of Germany, Prussia erased, Austria treated as innocent


Correction - 08th Feb 2010: instead to read: "........
“Once upon a time in Amber Path North, there it existed the glorious first Lutheran nation in the world...”.........." read: ".......“Once upon a time in Amber Path North, there it existed the glorious first Lutheran state in the world...”........". In fact Protestant and Lutheran Prussia was - as righteously stated by Douglas Willinger - a multiethnic/multinational state, with a large Protestant/German component.

(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)