Friday, September 30, 2011

INSIDE THE MIND OF ROME – The visit of the pope in Erfurt and the Continuing Peasants' wars of Rome

>

A man shot four times when the pope is in Erfurt. The police sources affirms that he shot to the security men of a security company. Significantly the following video at the address, which speaks about the event is disturbed, practically a continue "go and stop":


Erfurt

Versenden 24.09.2011

Schüsse vor der Papstmesse

Kurz bevor der Papst eine heilige Messe mit Gläubigen in Erfurt feiern wollte, ist es zu einem Zwischenfall mit einer Schußwaffe gekommen. Ein Mann feuerte viermal auf Mitarbeiter eines Sicherheitsunternehmens.


URL: http://www.welt.de/videos/politik/article13623359/Schuesse-vor-der-Papstmesse.html#autoplay



I tried the following one to test if there is a general problem, but the video about the space debris of the NASA satellite is perfect and absolutely not disturbed:



Weltraumschrott

Versenden 23.09.2011

Nasa erwartet Satelliten-Absturz auf die Erde

Ein ausrangierte Forschungssatellit der Nasa soll auf die Erde stürzen. Die Nasa gibt jedoch Entwarnung. Die Gefahr für Menschen sei "extrem gering".


URL: http://www.welt.de/videos/wissen/article13621272/Nasa-erwartet-Satelliten-Absturz-auf-die-Erde.html#autoplay




Then I came back to the previous video about the shooting during the pope's visit, and it was still disturbed. Then I tried again the video on the satellite of NASA: this time it was disturbed only the initial advertisement, but the sequent news service on the space debris was still perfect. I continued to switch between both videos, and effectively the video on the shooting during pope's visit was always disturbed, discouraging the eventual spectator, meanwhile the video on the NASA satellite was always OK!


PC and the web are the perfect environment to implement the censorship making it appear a "casual defect" or a "casual problem". But statistically this is only pure censorship, elsewhere the Quantum Mechanic theoretic physics should start to study the phenomena where a person exposing in Internet the church of Rome as responsible of the first and second world war, encounters always difficulties.


Which is the Quantum equation describing the statistical coincidence of such events? Erfurt is an important center for the Reformation, and the there visit of the pope is an open provocation. Could it be that someone really was hit on the nerves by the Beast of Rome? Let's see the religious history of Erfurt:



''................

Nearly two-thirds of the population profess no religion today. The evangelical church belonging to 26.0%, Roman Catholic Church 8.1%

(..........)

The Thuringian states were in the 16 Century one of the first Protestant areas in the world, as the reformer Martin Luther in the Elector Frederick of Saxony had a sponsor. In addition, the background of the Reformation played partly from Thuringia, Luther completed his theology studies at the University of Erfurt, his family even came from Mohra, the Bible translation was created in part on the Wartburg and the Peasants' War and the Schmalkaldic war as reformation effects contributed to larger parts in Thuringia. Even the Reformation Anabaptist movement was widespread in large parts of Thuringia. One of the centers of the central German Baptist was the city of Mulhouse, where 1525 had already acted Thomas Munzer [19] [20].

The Protestant Church however had then never the same social influence, as it had the Catholic Church in her areas. So most of the Thuringian states were already in the 18th Century liberal and enlightened thanks primarily to the Duke of Weimar family.

The German Christians caused the disintegration of the former Lutheran state church, the atheistic world view of the SED, the appropriate education in schools and career disadvantages for Christians contributed later to the fact that the majority of the population left the church, and today the proportion of Protestant Lutheran Christians in the total population is about one quarter. In Thuringia the Evangelical Church is part of the Protestant Church formed in 2009 in central Germany, which essentially comprises the states of Thuringia and Saxony-Anhalt. The former district Schmalkalden is the only country not part of the range of EKMD, but part of the Protestant Church of Kurhessen-Waldeck.

.............''


URL: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%BCringen#Religion



The visit of the emperor of Rome in Erfurt is therefore an open Jesuit provocation. Only on the surface I take note of that Jesuit-Nazi German Christians church which divided the Protestant front in the Hitler's Germany in order to favor the Roman Catholic predominance in the society. Rome staged a phoney war with Hitler, and no other actor should have stolen her role of (fake) victim on the stage of the Third Reich (Jesuits built purposely also for this goal). For this reason the Protestants had to be divided in fractions. Then you have the after war Communist punishment of Rome, which didn't of course convert to Roman Catholicism the Protestants of East Germany. It simply de-Christianized the protestants (= destroyed the Protestantism), preparing them to welcome the second phase, the Romanization. The 'atheism' spread in East Germany was only the freezer where the frozen the Germans, waiting the future where Rome would have cooked 'em in the Romish pot (to ate 'em as Roman Catholic food).




Above image - the pope in the land of the Mother of all Peasants' wars - URL: http://www.welt.de/politik/specials/papst/article13616282/Papst-Benedikt-XVI-und-die-Schuesse-in-Erfurt.html


But it is from the past of five centuries ago that comes the most important allusions of doc Ratzinger's visit.

Note the historical importance of Thuringia. First for the Anabaptist movement, which was righteously seen by Luther as a keen way - when in the hands of Rome - to weak – using a modern definition as it would be used today – his 'left' side, in other words with a direct competition aimed to give a powerful hit to one of the pillars of the Luther's theology, dragging away from his influence a discrete number of Roman Catholic priests who just were with the heart just on the side of Martin Luther Reform. Another attempt to destroy the Reform, even more dangerous, was the uprising of the peasants asking for secular reforms in front of the secular and religious power. At the beginning Martin Luther wanted to play a role of intermediary between the nobility and the peasants, agreeing with some requests coming from the protesters. This demonstrates the good intentions of Luther which the Roman Catholic perfidious propaganda continues to describe as a man filled with the "thirsty of blood":



With the 12 articles the rebels gave themselves to common objectives, ranging from the mere restoration of their customary rights to the abolition of serfdom reaching also democratic rights. They referred it to the "divine right" and to the Luther's principle sola scriptura. Like him, they agreed to drop their claims as soon as they prove them wrong from the Bible. This religiously based their earlier hopes for social liberation was first punch.


Luther distanced himself from the 12 items because of their mistaken in his view, citing the Bible. In April 1525 he tried in a pamphlet, however, an amicable agreement and a balanced judgment, accepted some legitimate claims of the farmers, and reprimanded both them and the Princes deal.


URL: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther#Haltung_zum_Deutschen_Bauernkrieg



Of course Luther wanted to conserve both the support of the peasants and the one of the nobility. And, of course, he was – not strange fact in the XVI century – more inclined towards the nobility than to the peasants. But in any case he never started to preach the blood bath against the peasants. So when and especially why does it happen?



But after some farmers an earl and his companions were murdered (Weinsberger murder), Luther wrote his treatise Against the murderous hordes of peasants. In it he condemned the riots as the work of the devil now and called all the princes - regardless of their religion - in this, the farmers with all necessary force to crush. Then reinforced the princes, in which Luther's word had weight, their counterpart army.


URL: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther#Haltung_zum_Deutschen_Bauernkrieg



Luther so immediately understood an important thing. Even if that act of blood against the nobility was spontaneous, and no caused by the Rome's intelligence of those times (at those times known under another term: ''perfidiousness''), it would have simply turned the Nobility against the Reform, because the Luther's teaching would have appeared as ''instigator of peasants' riots''.

So it is sudden clear that the true one who must be considered the spiritual supporter (if not also the material instigator) of the bloodshed was Rome. Rome understood that her future was depending from the result of the civil/revolutionary war in Germany. With the dirty water (the Peasants' riot), the nobility would have wiped away also the babies who produced that dirty water, I.e. Luther and his Reform, considered the ''spiritual fathers of the riots''. It is for this reason that Luther immediately invited also the Romish nobility in to fight the peasants' riots. Because it would have constrained the Roman Catholic leaders to get dirty also their hands with the blood of the peasants, in other words to get in enmity with an objective ally of the politic of their Romish church, and not to stay at the side with the arms crossed enjoining the spectacle of a civil/religious war in Germany wiping away the Reform. In the hypothesis they would have refused to join the ''war on peasants' terror'', they would have automatically demonstrated that they were the occult supporters and instigators of the uprising.


Not for a Quantum Mechanical coincidence I used the same language of George Bush when he started the invasion of Iraq as part of his ''war on Islamic terror''. Because meanwhile a genius like Luther never re-appeared, Rome could use his heritage in order to turn it against him the same in a symbolic way. Aren't the impoverished proletarian Arab masses constrained by the Romish World Democratic Government to stage the role of ''peasants rebelling the unrighteous oppression of a Western/secular world?''. Allusions, metaphors, farces and psychodramas are the central point in the development of the Continuing Counter Reformation and the underestimation of that is a deep mistake.


Rome and the Jesuits repeat the same schema, with variations of course, instigating every day ''peasant's riots''. See the 1848 revolutions, particularly the ones in Styria, Carniola, etc., where the intelligence of Slovenian bishop Slomšek let increase that ''peasants' riot'' against the central government of Vienna, till the point that today he is considered one of the most important Slovenian figure, for the Roman Catholics of course above the one of Primož Trubar. Or look at the open welcome by archbishop Gregorj Rožman of the Fascist aggressor in Yugoslavia in 1941 which instigated the increase of the military uprising of the Tito's partisans and favored the grip on power of the Communist party on the anti-fascist guerrilla. In its turn all that provoked a bloody reaction of the Italian Fascist occupation authorities and especially the one of the German authorities who were seeing the church of Rome and the Communist rebellion as secretly allied, especially after those twenty years of occupation of Slovenia territory (Rapallo's treaty borders) by the Fascist Italy.


Fascism oppressed the Slovenian priesthood who had its secret net of anti-fascist priests. And had a competitor in the anti-fascist struggle, the Bolshevism. Of course Germans were not blind, and observed how the continue warning against the ''threat of the Communism'' of the temporal coadjutor doc Janko Kralj (who at the same time, was an ardent anti-fascists and Slovenian nationalists) were strongly opposing to the Italian government laws about the language at the official religious rites, but were not so much heard by those oppressed priests the same who were mostly absorbed by the passive resistance against the Fascist authorities than by the 'holy' fight against Bolshevism. Those ideological attacks against the Communism in those twenty years could – for German political observers – have perfectly hidden an objective collaboration between the priests and the Communists, as both were enemy of Mussolini. If this allusive ideological and religious scenario was remembering to the German intelligence that old collaboration between riotous peasants and the nobility of Rome, aimed to destroy the Reform, it was surely not a casual effect.


But the principal goal of the ambiguous dealings of Janko Kralj, always with a feet in the priestly anti-fascist front and the other in that words of silent discrete contacts with important Fascist authorities, dealing consisting in a collaboration/armistice even with the Italian enemy justified in the name of the ''holy war against Bolshevism'', was just the inducement of the German observer in that automatic reflex of five centuries before.

That objective collaboration between the Communist riotous peasants and their priests in the Slovenia occupied by the German army, was allusively aired by the archbishop of Ljubljana (criminal of war) Gregorj Rožman, under whom also the priests in the German zone were submitted, when he welcomed in that Springtime 1941 the Fascist High Commissar Emilio Grazioli of Roman Catholic Fascist Italy with ''kisses & hugs'' (*). But a true peasants/priests' riot was instigated against the Germans incarnating now the role of the five hundreds years before Lutheran nobility. It is not a coincidence that the first arrests of the sentenced Slovenian in Second Trial of Trieste started in 1940, and continued all along the first months of the occupation of Yugoslavia, with the trial in the Autumn of 1941 and the death sentences at the beginning of December where just the Communist ones were condemned to death meanwhile the liberal ones went pardoned. But the details of this important phase of the war in another of my blogs. It is just sufficient the little I told you above to understand that the true snake in the mankind's paradise was not Bismarck but the papacy and the Jesuits' order.




....... . . . . . . . . INSIDE THE MIND OF ROME:


Friday, September 30, 2011

INSIDE THE MIND OF ROME - Balkans Crusade of Rome against secularity

Friday, September 30, 2011

INSIDE THE MIND OF ROME – The visit of the pope in Erfurt and the Continuing Peasants' wars of Rome



Friday, September 30, 2011

INSIDE THE MIND OF ROME – pedophilia scandal and Islam question in the Peasants' war/jacqueries of Rome

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.com/2011/09/inside-mind-of-rome-pedophilia-scandal.html

------------------------------------
(*) Wednesday, June 8, 2011
An objective collaboration
http://adrgegenreformationheute.blogspot.com/2011/06/objective-collaboration.html

Friday, June 10, 2011
"Objective collaborations": 10th June 1941
http://adrgegenreformationheute.blogspot.com/2011/06/objective-collaborations-10th-june-1941.html
--------------------------------------------
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

PREMEDITATED & CENSORED: on the annihilation of the first Protestant-Lutheran state in the world [moved from ABE blog]

>

Above image - Douglas Willinger caused to me to join Facebook. See a comment of mine in order to increase the attention on the Counter Reformation war which annihilated the FIRST Protestant (Lutheran) state of the world, East Prussia - on the page URL: https://www.facebook.com/pages/East-Prussia-Prussian-Movement-Freedom-for-East-Prussia/142612635778809


Please, follow the comments below the sequent post:

Friday, September 09, 2011

Kurds, Armenians and Berlin Congress: some ideas


............. . . . . . . .

Monday, September 12, 2011


Terrible & Premeditated CENSORED

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/09/terrible-premeditated-censored.html

Facebook page East Prussia - East Prussian Movement (Freedom for East Prussia) LOCKED and Administrator List Hidden

https://www.facebook.com/pages/East-Prussia-Prussian-Movement-Freedom-for-East-Prussia/142612635778809

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/09/terrible-premeditated.html

A revenge more terrible then commonly acknowledged.

The idea of setting up Germany to start and loose a brutal war with severe consequences eastward undeniably dovetails with the Jesuit Order's major goal of recapturing lands previously lost to “heretics” such as Lutherans, notably the post WW2 partition of East Prussia, historically the 1st Lutheran state in 1525.

De Zayes book focuses exclusively upon the expulsion of the ethnic Germans as a terrible revenge for the crimes of the 3rd Reich; it overlooks the broader picture of a continuing counter reformation directed by a man born into a prestigious Polish ‘Noble’ family – so-known for their devotion to the Vatican – who was only about 8 years old when his uncle Mieczyslaw was imprisoned by Otto Von Bismarck, leader of the predominantly Protestant state of Prussia that would prominently defy the Vatican with its KULTURKAMPF.




Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski's Goal Predicted by Maximillian Kolbe in 1938?



Rome's planned theft of the predominately Protestant areas of East Prussia, Pomerania, Silesia, etc to the north, came as the cap stone of an agenda of bloody religious war for the gain of the Roman Catholic Church Empire: a 20th century continuation of the counter reformation....

Ledochowski Religious War CENSORED at now defunct East Prussia BB
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/11/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-cover-up.html

0 comments:

-------------------------------------------------
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)

Friday, September 9, 2011

Kurd and Armenian questions as coffin where to bury the Berlin's Congress question?

>
Above image - "Armenian-populated regions in Anatolia, Western Armenia, and the Transcaucasus before the genocide." - URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide

Please, follow my line of reasoning - I am pondering on it since a long time.


Why is there so much silence on the Kurds' genocide?


I remember that every-time I was asking something, the typical character acting as “wise comrade” was shutting me down answering that "....at the end of all they had too a dirty past to hide", alluding to the massacres of Christians by the Ottoman empire to which the Kurds took part.


Has been the persecution on the Arab of “Palestine” engineered in order to hide the silent persecution of the Kurds? Leftist and "wise comrades" would not agree with me.....


In this case the disappearing of Christians away from Middle East is not a discover of EJP related to the last years, but something which is carried out since some centuries.


The Islam, under the identity of the Ottoman empire, used also Islamic Kurds to wipe away, with a sequence of massacres, the Assyrian:


The Assyrian people[22] (originally and most commonly known as Assyrians and other later variants of the name, such as; Syriacs, Atorayeh, Ashuriyun, Assouri, Syriac Christians, Suroye/Suryoye,[23] Chaldo-Assyrians, (see names of Syriac Christians) are a distinct ethnic group whose origins lie in ancient Mesopotamia. They are Eastern Aramaic speaking Semites who trace their ancestry back to the Sumero-Akkadian civilisation that emerged in Mesopotamia circa 3500 BC, and in particular to the northern region of the Akkadian lands, which would become known as Assyria by the 23rd Century BC. The Assyrian nation existed as an independent state, and often a powerful empire, from the 23rd century BC until the end of the 7th century BC. Today that ancient territory is part of several nations; Assyria was ruled as an occupied province under the rule of various empires from the late 7th century BC until the mid 7th century AD when it was dissolved, and the Assyrian people have gradually become a minority in their homelands since that time. They are indigenous to, and have traditionally lived all over Iraq, north east Syria, north west Iran, and the Southeastern Anatolia region of Turkey.[24]

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_people


Generally speaking, Assyrian population was Christian:


Assyrians were originally Pagans, who where followers of Ashurism, an Assyro-Babylonian religion, which is the Ancient Mesopotamian religion, and some adopted Judaism, Gnosticism and Manicheanism; however most now belong to various Christian denominations such as the Church of the East, with an estimated 300,000–400,000 members,[100] the Chaldean Catholic Church, with about 900,000 members,[101] and the Syriac Orthodox Church (ʿIdto Suryoyto Triṣaṯ Šuḇḥo), which has between 1,000,000 and 4,000,000 members around the world (only some of whom are Assyrians),[102] and various Protestant churches. While Assyrians are predominantly Christians, a number are generally irreligious.

.......

A small minority of Assyrians of the above denominations accepted the Protestant Reformation in the 20th century, possibly due to British influences, and is now organized in the Assyrian Evangelical Church, the Assyrian Pentecostal Church and other Protestant Assyrian groups. These are always called Assyrians

Source: see above


So the question is more clear now. The dirty Middle East game of today is the center around which the Romish World Democratic Government is revolving:





Above image: "...The international community is exaggerating the crisis in Syria which has been staged mainly by outsiders,.." (Caldean Bishop of Aleppo, SJ Antoine Audo - Also a Jesuit bishop's allusion: the ''Jewish outsiders'' backing Andrew Breivik???).


The creepy words of the Aleppo's Jesuit are giving charte blanche to Assad and consequently for the Kurd's genocide. Iran, Turkey and Syria are supporting the party of the pope which controls Israel, that “party of the peace”, Masonic-Shabtai Labour Zionism headed by Shimon Peres who, from the blood extracts reason of existence for his “battle for the peace”. Because at the same time also Turkey, Syria and Iran have a benefit from the “Palestinian Holocaust”, being it useful to hide the “Kurdish Holocaust”. Then Rome, above all parts in the game, is pursuing her evil dream of “Jerusalem international city” under UN control and seat of the “One World Religion”, of course a religion headed by the pope of Rome, as an answer and solution to the religious conflict in Palestine.


At the same time Kurds and their historical collaboration with the Ottoman empire in the suppression of Christian communities are serving as scapegoat in order to lighten the weight of the massacre's responsibility on the shoulder of Turkey which now must play the role of “saviour of the ethnic Palestinians” without too much evident contradictions. What a disguting spectacle, isn't it? The Roman Catholic empire is playing the alliance with the Islam galaxy on the mutual agreement based on the areas of influences. The immigration of Muslims in Europe and the aggression to the Islamic world by the “Zionism” and “America” are covering the murderous use of Islam by Rome also in the recent past, when Christians were decimated in the name of the Mohammed used by the Romish masonic Islam and by the Arab nationalist.


And, at the end of all, Kurds have to be eliminated because the secularism in the society sees the ethnic and cultural autonomy from a despotic central government as a natural reflex and consequence of the independence against any pyramidal, roman 'religious' center, today represented by the papacy. The Romish masonic govts of Iran, Turkey and Syria are the military and religious pillars of the gradual destruction of any secularism in the Islamic societies, and the Kurds represents a serious obstacle against this project. The extreme nationalism represent only a not perceived first step in this war on secularism. The same words of Wikipedia related to the Assyrians are brightly witnessing that:


In addition Western Media often makes no mention whatsoever of any ethnic identity of the Christian people of the region, and simply call them Christians or Iraqi Christians, Iranian Christians, Syrian Christians, Turkish Christians etc. This label is rejected by all Assyrian/Syriac Christians as well as Aramean, Phoenician and Coptic Christians, as it wrongly implies no difference other than theological with the Muslim Arabs, Kurds, Turks, Iranians and Azeris of the region.


Source: see above


But isn't this ethnic cleaning in the names only a discrete religious cleaning? As those ethnics were also implying a well defined religious identity, especially not submitted to Rome???

Those Assyrian population were mostly belonging to churches not submitted to Rome, often to the Assyrian Church of the East like in the case of the Simele massacre in 1933 by the Iraqi army,


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simele_Massacre



.......or the Assyrian genocide (1914-1918 AD):



Because of the mass killings, Mar Eshai Shimun XXIII was chosen as a Patriarch of the Assyrian Church of the East at only 11 years old.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_Genocide


Armenian church doesn't depend from the Romish church:


The Armenian Apostolic Church (Armenian: Հայաստանեայց Առաքելական Եկեղեցի, Hayastaneayc’ Aṙak’elakan Ekeġec’i) is the world's oldest National Church[2][3][4][5] and is one of the most ancient Christian communities.[6] Armenia was the first country to adopt Christianity as its official religion in 301 AD, in establishing this church. The Armenian Apostolic Orthodox Church traces its origins to the missions of Apostles Bartholomew and Thaddeus in the 1st century.


Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Apostolic_Church


In the Armenian Massacres of 1894–1896 the Kurds are used at large scale:


Another reason for the massacres was the channeling of Kurdish bandits upon Armenians instead of just anybody in the area. The eastern provinces of the Ottoman Empire were historically insecure; the Kurdish rebels ransacked neighboring towns and villages with impunity. When the empire was too weak and disorganized to halt them, Sultan Abdul Hamid gave a semi-official status to the Kurdish bandits. They were known as the Hamidiye Alaylari ("belonging to Hamid").[8] The formation of Armenian revolutionary groups began roughly around the end of the Russo-Turkish War of 1878 and intensified with the first introduction of Article 166 of the Ottoman Penal code 166, and the raid of Erzerum Cathedral. Article 166 was meant to control the possession of arms, but it was used to target Armenians by restricting their possession of arms.


Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamidian_massacre


Islamic population to be submitted were so instigated and used against the Christians. All that followed the Congress of Berlin, where the universalism of the secular empires were deadly threatening the universalism of Rome:


During the 18th century Ottoman Empire sustained extensive territorial losses (see: decline of the Ottoman Empire) and the Balkan nationalities, aided by European arms and diplomacy began their struggles for their liberation, (see: national awakening in the Balkans).[1] Most Armenians lived in provinces bordering Russia, and not any other European states. Russia—became increasingly involved in Ottoman affairs using the "capitulations of the Ottoman Empire" established after the Russian intervention in 1877-1878. Russia gained control over a large part of Armenia, and became the champion of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire (a protectorate clause). Russia was also instrumental in obtaining the independence of Romania (see:National awakening of Romania) and Serbia. Beginning with the Congress of Berlin, Armenian question become a pivotal factor, in which sometimes Russia had to step back as a result of the English and German pressure, or vice versa.


Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Question



The combination of Russian military success in Russo-Turkish War, 1877–1878, clear weakening of the Ottoman Empire from various angles, including financial (1873 and on Ottoman Empire suffered greatly from Panic of 1873, territorial (mentioned above), and hope that one day all of the Armenian territory might be ruled by Russia led to a new restiveness by Armenians living inside the Ottoman Empire. Starting around 1890, the Armenians began protesting to gain the protections promised them at Berlin. Unrest occurred in 1892 at Marsovan and in 1893 at Tokat. Armenians wanted civil reforms to be implemented in the Ottoman Empire and an end to discrimination; they demanded the right to vote and the right to establish a constitutional government.[6] The Sultan, however, was not prepared to relinquish any power. Turkish historian Osman Nuri observed, "The mere mention of the word 'reform' irritated him [Abdul Hamid], inciting his criminal instincts."[7]


Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamidian_massacre


The greatest responsible of such massacre's where not the Kurds, who where among the executor but moved by lower interests of the local communities and their bosses and not surely for a long and large-scale and far away in time project. The true responsible were just the founders of the modern Turkey nation, the Romish Masonic Young Turk party. Please, go with the mind to the "Young Italy" of Romish Masonic Giuseppe Mazzini and his church in London, dedicated to saint Peter, the master of the cornerstones (*). But like for the “Orthodox question” in Serbia, it is clear that the Berlin congress was aimed to solve the general religious question in Eurasia excluding Rome, his pope and his Jesuit controllers. For this reason the greatest inspirer of those massacre were 'modern' nationalists, in other words exponents of the nationalist movement born from the Jesuits' mind in the XVIII century to destroy the secular universalism of the empires. Beating and massacring Orthodox 'heretics' in Middle East, was simply meaning to beat and massacre the Berlin's congress:


The Powers forced Hamid to sign a new reform package designed to curtail the powers of the Hamidiye in October 1895 which, like the Berlin treaty, was never implemented. On October 1, 1895, two thousand Armenians assembled in Constantinople to petition for the implementation of the reforms but Ottoman police units converged towards the rally and violently broke it up.[12] Soon, massacres of Armenians broke out in Constantinople and then engulfed the rest of the Armenian-populated provinces of Bitlis, Diyarbekir, Erzerum, Harput, Sivas, Trabzon and Van. Thousands were killed and many more died during the cold winter of 1895-96. The worst atrocity took place in Urfa, where Ottoman troops burned the Armenian cathedral, in which 3,000 Armenians had taken refuge, and shot at anyone who tried to escape.[13]


Source: see above


"....The Armenian Apostolic Church......is the world's oldest National Church......Armenia was the first country to adopt Christianity as its official religion in 301 AD, in establishing this church.....".

Now all is more clear.....Burned down because that church was Armenian and not submitted to the universalism of Rome?

The creeping words of that Jesuit are so perfectly understandable:

"....The international community is exaggerating the crisis in Syria which has been staged mainly by outsiders.....".

It is incredible to see how the 'secular' nationalism of Islamic republic is elected to a cult, when useful to Rome, meanwhile no church in the world must be independent from the pope of Rome, as the same term "Roman universalism" witnesses!


Annihilating the Kurds today means also to cancel the religious legacy of the extreme importance of the Berlin's Congress in Eurasia. It is so not only a joke of the words to say that with the blood of Gaza they are hiding the ashes of Koenisberg:


Wednesday, February 17, 2010

The “Drei Freddy Krueger” populating the sleeps of Leo XIII


Monday, September 05, 2011

28,900,000 vs 6,720,000 - also in this way the Romish World Democratic Government assassinates


Thursday, September 08, 2011

Pacif(asc)ism burying Kurds with ''astounding archeological discoveries'' [& with Gaza]


(*) Sunday, May 24, 2009
Romish Masonic Giuseppe Mazzini, another Jesuit priest?
http://adrgegenreformationheute.blogspot.com/2009/05/romish-masonic-giuseppe-mazzini-another.html

------------------------------------------------
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)